Sub for more: nnn.is/the_new_media | The recent developments show significant changes in the strategy of the Western countries involved in the Syrian conflict. The US has sent ground forces, including special operations units, into the region. French Air Force has sharply increased the number of sorties, and France’s rapid-reaction troops and naval units are being moved closer to Syria. The United Kingdom has also begun to participate in the US-led anti-ISIS coalition strikes on Syrian soil. Likewise Germany has begun to deploy its aircraft and relocating almost 1200 quick-reaction troops to the Syria-Iraq battlefield. Turkey is deploying a large military attack force, including a number of armored units, at the border with Syria. It seems that NATO powers have realized the strategy aimed at Assad’s ouster by a diverse range of militant groups including ISIS which is backed by Turkey and the US has failed. According to the initial scenario implemented by the West, ISIS and other militant groups, deceitfully called the moderate opposition, were to carry out a Libya-like scenario in Syria and oust or preferably kill Assad and plunge the whole country into chaos. Then the US-led coalition would start a full-scale military operation to stop the terrorists threatening the “moderate opposition” in Syria, deploy NATO forces on the ground and take control of the crucial oil and logistic infrastructure. Western oil corporations supported by NATO would then restore the state of affairs as it existed more than 40 years ago. Syria would fall victim to total exploitation by overseas powers. The Mediterranean would become Alliance’ internal lake. Now it’s clear that Syria won’t fall under terrorist group pressure. The Syrian forces backed by Russia and Iran are gaining momentum, recapturing cities and facilities earlier controlled by militants. The NATO allies urgently need a new plan to hold control at least of the northern oil corridor from Iraq and try to take advantage of this opportunity to involve Russia in a long expensive war, in other words, to accomplish that which they failed to do in Ukraine. It means that the NATO contingent must occupy crucial infrastructure including oilfields before the Syrian government forces liberate it. Anti-government, meaning anti-Russian and anti-Iranian, forces would be established in parts of divided Syria. The need for an excuse to implement the changed approach could be the reason why the Nov.13 Paris attack wasn’t prevented by the Western special services. The implication of the Western plan to divide Syria in a number of vassal entities leads to 3 main scenarios: See the report here: youtu.be/sWtDLVu-O1s Credit/source: southfront.org/foreign-policy-diary-escalation-in-syria-leads-to-a-global-war/ Chip in $5/mo: nnn.is/monthly-gift-5 Give once: nnn.is/one-time-gift Give BTC: nnn.is/donate-bitcoin Limited gear: nnn.is/get-your-gear-here Gold buyer's strategy: nnn.is/free-gold-secret Teach Your Child About Liberty and the Proper Role of Government: nnn.is/1HvxU37 Watch Us on Tiger Steam! nnn.is/GET-TIGER --- $50 off promocode: BUYTIGERSTREAM Cast your vote in the Selection 2016 Poll: nextnewsnetwork.com/election-2016-poll/ Facebook/Twitter/Site: Facebook.com/NextNewsNet Twitter.com/NextNewsNet NextNewsNetwork.com Hashtag: #N3

Be the first to comment