Interface Politics. Table C. Verónica Soria. "A brief study of audio editing tools and programming environments"

submitted by gdeumal on 09/12/16 1

Table C: Cooperative and Generative "A Brief Study of Audio Editing Tools and Programming Environments. According to the Concept of Interpassivity" In the audio editing tools, interface design can influence the decisions made by the user. In this sense, the composer is the producer of sound work, but is also the receiver of the design of the means used, in this case, the interface. Therefore, the audio editing tools mediate between the composer and his work, but also between the composer and the cultural preconceptions and social expectations of their work. For example, the default setting of many audio editors is a four-beat rhythm bar and a tempo of 120 beats per minute, which is the predominant in the music of the culture industry. Also, the widespread use of digital tools has been attached to a compressed sound and it has virtually removed dynamic changes, as is the rule in commercial music. In this sense, the interface favors an internalization of the dominant taste — and by extension of the dominant ideology, for which the music serves as a vehicle — by the user. + INFO: www.gredits.org/interfacepolitics/en/a-brief-study-of-audio-editing-tools-and-programming-environments-according-to-the-concept-of-interpassivity/

Leave a comment

Be the first to comment

Email
Message
×
Embed video on a website or blog
Width
px
Height
px
×
Join Huzzaz
Start collecting all your favorite videos
×
Log in
Join Huzzaz

facebook login
×
Retrieve username and password
Name
Enter your email address to retrieve your username and password
(Check your spam folder if you don't find it in your inbox)

×